The basis of the Eugenics movement began after the Civil War where an uncertain economy and a sudden implosion of foreign immigrants from southern and eastern Europe threatened American values.
Along with the sudden migration of Europeans, huge differences between the classes came into view and the idea of Social Darwinism made itself present in America. Social Darwinism explains survival of the fittest in terms of the capability of an individual to survive within a competitive environment. This helped explain social inequalities by saying the wealthier individuals were better and had a better standing in society and therefore would produce more. However this was not happening and the birth rate of the social elite was declining while the birthrate of the impoverished was increasing dramatically. As the government failed in lending aid to the poor they utilized the idea of scientific management, known as progressivism to deal with the poor. Progressive reformers relied on science to control both nature and human society. This view of science as a method of reform and the newly rediscovered science of genetics gave rise to social engineering in Eugenics.European Migrants entering the United States. |
Americans were the first people and scientists to bring the idea of narrowing the gene-pool into the general populaces view despite the popular opinion that Hitler and his regime were. A few of the founders of the theory of Eugenics were H.G. Wells, the young Winston Churchill, George Bernard Shaw and Alexander Graham Bell.
These influential figures greatly affected the publics views on Eugenics. These men and fellow Social Darwinists saw medical care as giving the "weak" an increased ability to survive, instead of allowing nature to take its course and eliminate defective people. German Social Darwinist Alfred Ploetz introduced the term "racial hygiene" and criticized those who helped the weak survive. Ploetz popularized the argument that racial hygiene benefited all people. Ploetz was the beginning of what was going to become the Nazi regime.George Bernard Shaw |
Alfred Ploetz |
Darwin-Hitler |
Eugenics believed that faulty genetics in the human gene-pool led to "unwanted" human beings. Eugenicists believed that charity and welfare were only temporary solutions to the problem and that they, the Eugenicists, would eliminate the disease. These ideas may seem fanatical and rightly so but in America they were only used for small reforms that aimed to progress American people, while in countries abroad leaders used this idea as an excuse to exterminate and sterilize millions. During the very beginning of the Third Reich many American Eugenicists supported Hitlers ideals and even encouraged Americans to adopt them. As history will tell Hitler used this as an excuse for atrocities against the Jews but also against his own people. At the end of his reign he had sterilized a total of 410,600 German people.
Sterilization laws in the Untied states were first enacted by Indiana in 1907 where soon after 12 more states followed in suit.
The first major model for the Eugenics sterilization law was conceived by Henry Laughlin. The Law proposed to authorize sterilization of the "socially inadequate" – people supported in institutions or "maintained wholly or in part by public expense. The law encompassed the "feebleminded, insane, criminalistic, epileptic, inebriate, diseased, blind, deaf; deformed; and dependent" – including "orphans, ne'er-do-wells, tramps, the homeless and paupers." By 1924 3,000 people had been involuntarily sterilized the majority were sterilized in California. Virginia was one of the first states to adopt laughlins model and put it in use.
Indiana's plaque on Eugenics law |
Carrie Buck and her mother |
Along with Eugenics Came the many protests and trials against it. Many people argued that what they were doing was inhumane but that did not stop the state governments from trying. There were many court cases the most notable was Buck vs. Bell. Where the young Carrie Buck was accused and "deficient" enough to warrant being sterilized. The prosecutors used evidence such as her mother was an an institute for the epileptic and feeble minded. Carrie was the first Virginian to be sterilized and was soon followed by over 8,300 hundred fellow Virginians.
The end of Eugenics came when Americans realized that many of the supposed biologically inferior groups reached their second and third generation in America, such as the Jews, and Eastern Europeans, many did extremely well, empirically documenting that such groups were not biologically-defective. It soon became clear that the accusations against these groups stood on an unstable foundation and were tenuous at best. As Eugenics came crashing down even the idea of natural selection came under attack. It was realized more and more that the many supposed sources of natural selection, especially war, plagues, and disease, did not kill off primarily the weaker, but a major factor that influences who died was chance. And those who may have an innate disposition to resist a certain disease quite often had an innate weakness to succumb to others.
Annotated Bibliography:
Shepherd, Jerry P., Dr. "Eugenics, Sterilization, & Social Control in the U.S."Eugenics. University of Texas In El Paso, 10 Apr. 2011. Web. 09 Feb. 2015. This site came from a lecture that goes over every possible aspect of Eugenics from how it affects the brain to its impact on communities and politics.
"The History of Eugenics in." History of Eugenics. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Feb. 2015.This sources bounce around in discussing Eugenics in all aspects such as marriage laws and its ties to Hitler and the Nazi regime.
Lothrop, Stoddard, PhD. "CHAPTER 105." CHAPTER 105. American Life League., n.d. Web. 09 Feb. 2015. This site gives responses to the Eugenics movement given by Christians and Pro-life groups. This site is very biased against the movement but also gives multiple quotes from higher ups of the Eugenics movement.
Kaelbaer, Lutz. "Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States."Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States. University of Vermont, 2012. Web. 08 Feb. 2015. This site gives me a general overview of the Eugenics movement but also allows me to click on each state and see how the movement affected them and what laws they enacted and even the documents of who was sterilized.
Lombardo, Paul A. A Century of Eugenics in America: From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era. Bloomington, IN: Indiana U, 2010. The University Of Chicago Press, Dec. 2011. Web. 20 Feb. 2015. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/662511>. Paul Lombardo is a well known author on the sterilization laws that emerged out of the early 20th‐century eugenics movement, his book goes into great detail on the laws and gives an in depth analysis on them and their uses by the Eugenics movement.
Davenport, Charles Benedict. Eugenic Marriage Laws In America. 2747 ed. Vol. 2. London: British Medical Journal, 1913. Print. This book gives an in depth analysis on the passing of laws in America and also gives a view of America from the outside in. It also gives detailed interviews explaining both American and British opinions on the Eugenics movement.
Field, James Alfred. The Progress of Eugenics. 1st ed. Vol. 26. Cambridge: Harvard U, 1911. Print. The Quarterly Journal Of Economics. This book gives the roots of the Eugenics Movement in America and highlights the effects it had on communities both good and bad.
Brinkley, Alan. "Roosevelt and Conservation." American History. 12th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2007. Whole Book. Print.
It's interesting how they tried to get rid of unwanted humans.
ReplyDeleteI am confused about how they "sterilized" humans.
How has eugenics affected today's world?
They sterilized humans by giving them certain chemicals to make their reproductive organs stagnant. The Eugenics movement has died down and is mostly non-existent a big part of that is because of Hitler and the way he "used" Eugenics as an excuse to massacre millions and sterilize hundreds of thousand of his own people.
Delete1) i was intrigued at how people looked at is as giving "the weak" another opportunity as opposed to let nature eliminate them.
ReplyDelete2) I am curious about how so many people thought of this to be inhuman but the government did not even acknowledge their opinions.
3) So many people from California were sterilized, so did location have anything to do with it or was that just because it was such a big state?
Yes the government was so inept to deal with the problems that were arising elsewhere that they cared little and payed little attention to people that did not benefit them. Yes the location did have an effect on how many people were sterilized, much like today how many products say they cannot be sold in California it is because of laws set in place that either make it easier for products to be sold or not, so it is the same thing for sterilization where laws made it easier for the "deficient" populous to be sterilized.
DeleteI thought your paper was interesting in its talk about the end of eugenics in America. I am curious about the support by Americans of the third reich in Germany. My question is: why are you such a dork jk how were people sterilized, what was the procedure like?
ReplyDeleteThe process can also just a simple surgery that can render a persons reproductive organs useless or they just take them out as a whole which is a little more risky. Also they could use chemicals to do the something but that cold go wrong in many ways.I.E wrong dosage of a certain chemical and such.
DeleteThis is terrible. Not your essay, but the fact that they would do that. Why isn't this more well known?
ReplyDeleteThis is terrible. Not your essay, but the fact that they would do that. Why isn't this more well known?
ReplyDeleteIt is well known in the aspect that Hitler based the premise of the Nazi regime on an aspect of Eugenics. It is also not well known because the government after WWII did not want Americans to really know that they also believed in some of the same things as Hitler did and some Americans actually supported Hitler in the early stages of his leadership/
Delete1. It frustrates me that things like this are a part of our history how can they treat human beings like that
ReplyDelete2. I am curious as to why people back then did not understand how horrible it was and if they did not do anything about
3. Why do you think people choose to treat other human beings this way?
Yes it is quite frustrating that they had such a diluted view of how human beings were. People thought they could treat other human beings like that because they thought themselves superior IE the blonde haired, blue eyed Caucasian person. Also they believed in Darwins principle of survival of the fittest and that it also applied to humans. Also the racist prejudice placed a large role in why they were sterilizing the "inferior" races.
Delete1.Your paper was very well written but your topic is terrible on how people were treated!!!
ReplyDelete2. Why did the government not intervine, because if incidents like this happened today, they would never get let down easy because of the media.
3. How did the Buck vs. Bell case not get used as a inhumane example? Instead other examples just followed in the process.
1.Your paper was very well written but your topic is terrible on how people were treated!!!
ReplyDelete2. Why did the government not intervine, because if incidents like this happened today, they would never get let down easy because of the media.
3. How did the Buck vs. Bell case not get used as a inhumane example? Instead other examples just followed in the process.